Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (4a)

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (4a) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4; estimated prices are $1799 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 39/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (4a) has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,148,725); the Nothing Phone (4a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) by 38 points (77/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
Nothing Phone (4a)
Performance 9
Display 100
Camera 37
Battery 48
Design 62
Value for money 86
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1148725
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1237
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3281
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (4a) better?
  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Lighter: 190g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $349 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (4a), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 38 points higher (77/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) leads (86/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (92/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (91/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (4a) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (86/100 vs 0/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Nothing Phone (4a): The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr Fold Nothing Phone (4a)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
AnTuTu 3942923 1148725
Geekbench Single 3640 1237
Geekbench Multi 11033 3281
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 2412x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX9 IP64
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm 164.0×77.6×8.6 mm
Weight 285 g 190 g
Price $1799 $349
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Nothing Phone (4a)
  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Nothing Phone (4a)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2412x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Nothing Phone (4a)
  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
48
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (4a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (4a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4
39/100 -243.2%
1148725 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (4a) by 243.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799
Nothing Phone (4a)
$349

Price difference: $1450. Nothing Phone (4a) is cheaper by $1450.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (92/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) (91/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (4a) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (62/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (86/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4a) by 38 points (77/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nothing Phone (4a) — 39/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (4a)?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (4a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.