Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (3a)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; launch prices were $1799 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 60/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 1,050,601); the Nothing Phone (3a) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Nothing Phone (3a)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 1050601
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3390
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $1799
- Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (3a), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 23 points higher (83/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Nothing Phone (3a) — 56/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (90/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (68/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nothing Phone (3a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 1050601 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1161 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 3390 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $329 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (3a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 191.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1470. Nothing Phone (3a) was $1470 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (90/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (68/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 23 points (83/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) — 60/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users.