Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (3a)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; estimated prices are $1799 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 42/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,044,507); the Nothing Phone (3a) is noticeably lighter (201g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1044507
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3315
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 7/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 42/100)
- Lighter: 201g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $329 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (48/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (87/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (3a), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 35 points higher (77/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 7/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) leads (87/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (92/100 vs 7/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (48/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (87/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nothing Phone (3a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 1044507 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3315 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 201 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $329 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (3a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 277.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1470. Nothing Phone (3a) is cheaper by $1470.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (92/100 vs 7/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (48/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (87/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 35 points (77/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) — 42/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 7/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.