Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (2a)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (2a) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro; launch prices were $1799 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 59/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 985,261); the Nothing Phone (2a) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Nothing Phone (2a)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 985261
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3000
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $1799
- Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (2a), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 24 points higher (83/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Nothing Phone (2a) — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (68/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nothing Phone (2a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 985261 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 3000 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2412x1084 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 / Nothing OS 2.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 161.7×76.3×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $349 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (2a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1084
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (2a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (2a) by 210.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1450. Nothing Phone (2a) was $1450 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (90/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (91/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (68/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing Phone (2a) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) by 24 points (83/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nothing Phone (2a) — 59/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.