Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (2a)
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (2a) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro; launch prices were $1099 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 59/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (2a) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 985,261); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.6mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Nothing Phone (2a)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 985261
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3000
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 59/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $1099
- Overall rating 59/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (2a), the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 17 points higher (76/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Nothing Phone (2a) — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 57/100. In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Nothing Phone (2a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 985261 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3000 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2412x1084 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 / Nothing OS 2.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.7×76.3×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $349 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (2a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1084
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Nothing Phone (2a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (2a) by 200.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $750. Nothing Phone (2a) was $750 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (91/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 57/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (2a) — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Nothing Phone (2a) — 59/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.