Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3)
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $1099 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nothing Phone (3) leads — 77/100 vs 76/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 2,371,693); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 2371693
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6847
- Faster charging: 68W vs 65W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 82/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
- Bigger battery: 5150 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 198g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1099
- Better camera (81/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3), the Nothing Phone (3) scores 1 points higher (77/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Nothing Phone (3) — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 2371693 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 6847 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5150 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 198 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3) by 24.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $300. Nothing Phone (3) was $300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) edges out the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Nothing Phone (3) — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) leads on camera score (81/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.