Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3)

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; estimated prices are $1099 and $799. Both devices score the same overall rating of 76/100. Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 2,306,162); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.0mm).

Both devices scored the same rating of 76/100 — the choice comes down to your priorities.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
Nothing Phone (3)
Performance 81
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 63
Portability 49
Value for money 64
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 2306162
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 6847
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 65W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (68/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
  • Bigger battery: 5150 vs 4700 mAh
  • Lighter: 198g vs 199g
  • Cheaper: $799 vs $1099

  • Better camera (81/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) received the same MobileRank rating — 76/100. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Nothing Phone (3): The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Nothing Phone (3)
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
AnTuTu 3113462 2306162
Geekbench Single 3041 2162
Geekbench Multi 9494 6847
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 2800x1260
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 5150 mAh
Charging 68W 65W
Wireless charging 30W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm
Weight 199 g 198 g
Price $1099 $799
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Nothing Phone (3)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Nothing Phone (3)
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Nothing Phone (3)
  • 5150 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (3) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
76/100 -35.0%
2306162 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3) by 35.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099
Nothing Phone (3)
$799

Price difference: $300. Nothing Phone (3) is cheaper by $300.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?

Both devices scored 76/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Nothing Phone (3) — 76/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?

The Nothing Phone (3) leads on camera score (81/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 81/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3)?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.