Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Nothing Phone (3)
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $1499 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 77/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 2,371,693); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Nothing Phone (3)
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 2371693
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6847
- Faster charging: 68W vs 65W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
- Bigger battery: 5150 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 198g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1499
- Better camera (81/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Nothing Phone (3), the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 1 points higher (78/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Nothing Phone (3) — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Nothing Phone (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 2371693 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 6847 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5150 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 198 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Nothing Phone (3), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Nothing Phone (3) by 42.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $700. Nothing Phone (3) was $700 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (3) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Nothing Phone (3) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Nothing Phone (3) — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) leads on camera score (81/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.