Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; launch prices were $1499 and $459. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 61/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 1,063,109); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 1063109
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3390
- Faster charging: 68W vs 50W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) Pro better?
- Cheaper at launch: $459 vs $1499
- Better camera (64/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 17 points higher (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 49/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (64/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 1063109 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1161 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3390 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 50W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $459 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 217.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1040. Nothing Phone (3a) Pro was $1040 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (64/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (64/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 61/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for active users.