Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Nothing Phone (2a)
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (2a) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro; launch prices were $1499 and $349. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 59/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 985,261); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.6mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Nothing Phone (2a)
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 985261
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3000
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 59/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (2a) better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $349 vs $1499
- Overall rating 59/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Nothing Phone (2a), the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 19 points higher (78/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Nothing Phone (2a) — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (95/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (64/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Nothing Phone (2a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 985261 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3000 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2412x1084 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 / Nothing OS 2.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.7×76.3×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $349 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (2a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2412x1084
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (2a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Nothing Phone (2a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Nothing Phone (2a) by 243.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1150. Nothing Phone (2a) was $1150 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (95/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (2a) are nearly equal (60/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (2a) (64/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (2a) — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Nothing Phone (2a) — 59/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Nothing Phone (2a)?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.