Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; launch prices were $1099 and $459. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 61/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 1,063,109); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 1063109
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3390
- Faster charging: 68W vs 50W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $459 vs $1099
- Better camera (64/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 15 points higher (76/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 1063109 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1161 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3390 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 50W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $459 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 178.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $640. Nothing Phone (3a) Pro was $640 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (91/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for active users.