Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; estimated prices are $1099 and $459. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 61/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 1,063,102); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 1063102
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3315
- Faster charging: 68W vs 50W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Cheaper: $459 vs $1099
- Better camera (64/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 15 points higher (76/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 1063102 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3315 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 50W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $459 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 50W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) Pro by 192.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $640. Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is cheaper by $640.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (92/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) Pro is a better fit for active users.