Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3a)
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; estimated prices are $1099 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 60/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3a) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 1,044,507); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 1044507
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3315
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 62/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Cheaper: $329 vs $1099
- Better camera (61/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3a), the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 16 points higher (76/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (92/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 62/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 1044507 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3315 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $329 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 198.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $770. Nothing Phone (3a) is cheaper by $770.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (92/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (64/100 vs 62/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3a) — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) — 60/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users.