Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3a)
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; launch prices were $1099 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 60/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 1,050,601); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3a)
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 1050601
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1161
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3390
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?
- Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $1099
- Better camera (61/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3a), the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 17 points higher (77/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Nothing Phone (3a) — 56/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3a) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 1050601 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1161 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3390 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2392x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $329 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (3a)
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2392x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nothing Phone (3a)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 197.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $770. Nothing Phone (3a) was $770 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (91/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably better than the Nothing Phone (3a) — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) — 60/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3a)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for active users.