Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3a)

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (3a) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; estimated prices are $1099 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 42/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,044,507); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.4mm).

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 31 points (73/100 vs 42/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 58
Battery 51
Design 51
Value for money 34
Nothing Phone (3a)
Performance 7
Display 100
Camera 58
Battery 42
Design 48
Value for money 87
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1044507
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3315
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 199g vs 201g

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 7/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3a) better?
  • Cheaper: $329 vs $1099

  • Better value for money (87/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Nothing Phone (3a), the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 31 points higher (73/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 7/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) leads (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (92/100 vs 7/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100. In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (87/100 vs 34/100).

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Nothing Phone (3a): The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Nothing Phone (3a)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
AnTuTu 3942923 1044507
Geekbench Single 3640 1162
Geekbench Multi 11033 3315
Display 7.0" pOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2992 2392x1080
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.1
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP54
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 163.5×77.5×8.4 mm
Weight 199 g 201 g
Price $1099 $329
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
58
camera
Nothing Phone (3a)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
58
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2992
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
100
display
Nothing Phone (3a)
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2392x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Nothing Phone (3a)
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
42
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3a), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
73/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
42/100 -277.5%
1044507 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3a) by 277.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
$1099
Nothing Phone (3a)
$329

Price difference: $770. Nothing Phone (3a) is cheaper by $770.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) (92/100 vs 7/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100.

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 42/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a) are nearly equal (51/100 vs 48/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (3a) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (87/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (3a) by 31 points (73/100 vs 42/100).

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Nothing Phone (3a) — 42/100.

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 7/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3a)?

The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3a) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.