Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Nothing Phone (3)
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Nothing Phone (3) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $1099 and $799. Both devices score the same overall rating of 77/100. Key differences: the Nothing Phone (3) has the bigger battery (5150 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 2,371,693); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.0mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Nothing Phone (3)
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 2371693
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 2162
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 6847
- Faster charging: 68W vs 65W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 82/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (3) better?
- Bigger battery: 5150 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 198g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1099
- Better camera (81/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3) received the same MobileRank rating — 77/100. In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) leads (81/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Nothing Phone (3) — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Nothing Phone (3) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 2371693 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 2162 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 6847 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5150 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / Nothing OS 3.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 160.6×75.6×9.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 198 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Nothing Phone (3)
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Nothing Phone (3)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nothing Phone (3)
- 5150 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Nothing Phone (3), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Nothing Phone (3) by 31.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $300. Nothing Phone (3) was $300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nothing Phone (3) notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (81/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Nothing Phone (3) and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing Phone (3) (68/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
Both devices scored 77/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (91/100 vs 82/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nothing Phone (3) — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Nothing Phone (3) leads on camera score (81/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Nothing Phone (3)?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Nothing Phone (3) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.