Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (4b)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (4b) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4; launch prices were $1799 and $355. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 55/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (4b) has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 975,254); the Nothing Phone (4b) is noticeably lighter (210g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Nothing Phone (4b)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 975254
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1087
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3148
- Faster charging: 68W vs 33W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 59/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 47/100)
What makes Nothing Phone (4b) better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 210g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $355 vs $1799
- Overall rating 55/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (4b), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 28 points higher (83/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Nothing Phone (4b) — 42/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (4b) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nothing Phone (4b) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 975254 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1087 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 3148 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2344 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.4×78.2×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $355 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (4b)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (4b)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Nothing Phone (4b)
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (4b), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (4b) by 213.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1444. Nothing Phone (4b) was $1444 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (90/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (4b) are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (91/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 47/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) by 28 points (83/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Nothing Phone (4b) — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.