Motorola Razr Fold vs Nothing Phone (4b)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Nothing Phone (4b) (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4; estimated prices are $1799 and $355. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 34/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Nothing Phone (4b) has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 969,048); the Nothing Phone (4b) is noticeably lighter (210g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Nothing Phone (4b)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 969048
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1071
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3057
- Faster charging: 68W vs 33W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 4/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 210g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $355 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (85/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Nothing Phone (4b), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 43 points higher (77/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) leads (85/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (85/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Nothing Phone (4b) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 969048 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1071 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3057 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2344 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.4×78.2×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 210 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $355 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing Phone (4b)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing Phone (4b)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2344
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Nothing Phone (4b)
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Nothing Phone (4b), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Nothing Phone (4b) by 306.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1444. Nothing Phone (4b) is cheaper by $1444.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (92/100 vs 4/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) (91/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (37/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nothing Phone (4b) significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (85/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Nothing Phone (4b) by 43 points (77/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Nothing Phone (4b) — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 4/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Nothing Phone (4b)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Nothing Phone (4b) is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.