Honor 200 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads — 70/100 vs 65/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 1,002,480); the Honor 200 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 204g).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra edges out the Honor 200 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor 200

Performance 58
Display 83
Camera 65
Battery 65
Portability 70
Value for money 58

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Honor 200 better?

  • Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 65W
  • Lighter: 187g vs 204g

  • Longer battery life (65/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (83/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 52/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 1002480
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 1131
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 3111
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 65/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor 200 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra scores 5 points higher (70/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 leads (65/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (70/100 vs 52/100).

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor 200 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 1002480 1294871
Geekbench Single 1131 1662
Geekbench Multi 3111 4188
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2664x1200 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5200 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 65W
DXOMark (camera) 130 —
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 64 MP
Front camera 50 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 4000 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 187 g 204 g
Launch price $399 —

Camera comparison

Honor 200

  • Main: 50MP f/1.95
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
65
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Honor 200

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2664x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Honor 200

  • 5200 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
65
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor 200 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor 200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
65/100
1002480 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
70/100 +22.6%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads Honor 200 by 22.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor 200

$399

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor 200 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 (86/100 vs 65/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (70/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra edges out the Honor 200 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 65/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on performance (68/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Honor 200 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.