Honor 200 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 65/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 1,002,480); the Honor 200 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 204g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Honor 200 better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Lighter: 187g vs 204g
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 1002480
- Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 3111
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (68/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 6 points higher (71/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor 200 (86/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (70/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Honor 200 by 22.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Honor 200 (86/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (70/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition edges out the Honor 200 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 65/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.