Honor 200 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 leads — 65/100 vs 58/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 1,002,480).
Honor 200
ZTE Axon 40
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 187g vs 200g
- Better camera (65/100 vs 51/100)
- Longer battery life (65/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 73/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 53/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 1002480
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2967
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the Honor 200 scores 7 points higher (65/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 leads (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 leads (65/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (61/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (83/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (70/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2967 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | — |
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor 200 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Honor 200 by 0.8% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Honor 200 are nearly equal (61/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (83/100 vs 73/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 51/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (70/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The Honor 200 edges out the ZTE Axon 40 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The Honor 200 leads on camera score (65/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Honor 200 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.