Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 71/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,294,871); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Lighter: 204g vs 226g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 17 points higher (88/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 156.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (94/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.