Vivo X300 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 71/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 230g).
Vivo X300 Ultra
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)
- Lighter: 204g vs 230g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 20 points higher (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (99/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (85/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $950 | — |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 229.0% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (99/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (85/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 20 points (91/100 vs 71/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.