Vivo X500 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Vivo X500 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro leads — 90/100 vs 71/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X500 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (5,016,623 vs 1,294,871).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X500 Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Vivo X500 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5016623 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 192g vs 204g
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 71/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X500 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Vivo X500 Pro scores 19 points higher (90/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X500 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 5016623 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 4188 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 13145 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2660 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.8×71.9×8.1 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $970 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X500 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2660
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X500 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X500 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 287.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (100/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X500 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X500 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X500 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X500 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X500 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 90/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X500 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X500 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X500 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Vivo X500 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.