Vivo X300 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40

The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 58/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,010,069); the ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

ZTE Axon 40

Performance 61
Display 73
Camera 51
Battery 52
Portability 53
Value for money —

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1010069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1298
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3520
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 51/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 73/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 better?

  • Lighter: 200g vs 230g

  • Better portability (53/100 vs 39/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 40, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 33 points higher (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (99/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (89/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (96/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (85/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 40: The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo X300 Ultra ZTE Axon 40
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
AnTuTu 4247433 1010069
Geekbench Single 3639 1298
Geekbench Multi 11047 3520
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.7"
Resolution 3168x1440 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W —
Wireless charging 40W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 170 —
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 44 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB —
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 12 Snow Cone
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 —
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 230 g 200 g
Launch price $950 —

Camera comparison

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

ZTE Axon 40

  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 44MP
51
camera

Display comparison

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

ZTE Axon 40

  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
73
display

Battery and charging

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

ZTE Axon 40

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100
4247433 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
58/100 -320.5%
1010069 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 40 by 320.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

ZTE Axon 40

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (99/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (89/100 vs 73/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (96/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (85/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.