Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 71/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (204g vs 226g).
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 65W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
- Lighter: 204g vs 226g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 16 points higher (87/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (93/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3269794 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $899 | — |
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra by 153.3% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (93/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (81/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.