Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $899 and $700. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 73/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,757,044); the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 30/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 60 Ultra better?
- Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $899
- Overall rating 73/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 15 points higher (88/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Axon 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 1757044 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | — | |
| Launch price | $899 | $700 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by 89.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $199. ZTE Axon 60 Ultra was $199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 30/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.