Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 73/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,420,808); the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 56/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 50 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 226g
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (50/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 15 points higher (88/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Axon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 1420808 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 1761 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 4688 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 161.8×73.1×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Axon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads ZTE Axon 50 Ultra by 134.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (94/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (96/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 86/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Axon 50 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.