Poco C85 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $92 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 32/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C85 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 358,383); the Poco C85 4G is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Poco C85 4G
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $92 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (43/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1416
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Poco C85 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 25 points higher (57/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C85 4G (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Poco C85 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 810 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $92 | $2899 |
Poco C85 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Poco C85 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C85 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Poco C85 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Poco C85 4G by 87.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2807. Poco C85 4G is cheaper by $2807.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C85 4G (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (49/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Poco C85 4G are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (43/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Poco C85 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Poco C85 4G by 25 points (57/100 vs 32/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C85 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco C85 4G has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C85 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C85 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C85 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Poco C85 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.