Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $2899 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads — 81/100 vs 69/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger battery (5700 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 2,342,433); the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is noticeably lighter (236g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 2342433
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 7192
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 83/100)
- Bigger battery: 5700 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 236g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $1499 vs $2899
- Better camera (84/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro scores 12 points higher (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (84/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 42/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 68/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 2342433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 7192 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $1499 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 24.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1400. Vivo X Fold3 Pro was $1400 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 81/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads on camera score (84/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.