Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $999 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 70/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger battery (5700 mAh vs 4900); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 2,251,381); the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is noticeably lighter (190g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26+
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 2251381
- Better Geekbench Single: 2900 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9200 vs 6511
- Lighter: 190g vs 236g
- Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1499
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 82/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (72/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5700 vs 4900 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Better camera (84/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26+ vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro scores 10 points higher (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (84/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (81/100 vs 54/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26+ — 50/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (84/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (81/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (72/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26+ | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 2600 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3161126 | 2251381 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2900 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9200 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4900 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $999 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26+ and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 40.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S26+ was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (91/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (84/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26+ (81/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26+ notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (72/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S26+ — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26+ and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 80/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads on camera score (84/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26+ or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ leads on performance (91/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26+ over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26+ is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.