Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold3 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3; launch prices were $1299 and $1499. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 80/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold3 Pro has the bigger battery (5700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,939,244 vs 2,251,381); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably lighter (214g vs 236g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3939244 vs 2251381
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 6511
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 214g vs 236g
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1499
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 84/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold3 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5700 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 60W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 61/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo X Fold3 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 4 points higher (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro leads (81/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100, Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (97/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (81/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | Vivo X Fold3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 3939244 | 2251381 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 2203 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 6511 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 2200x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | 160.0×142.4×5.2 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 236 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | $1499 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2200x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Vivo X Fold3 Pro
- 5700 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo X Fold3 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Vivo X Fold3 Pro by 75.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X Fold3 Pro (97/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro are nearly equal (86/100 vs 84/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (81/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (54/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra edges out the Vivo X Fold3 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo X Fold3 Pro — 80/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo X Fold3 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X Fold3 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.