Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO 15
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $2899 and $599. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 69/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 is faster in AnTuTu (3,740,528 vs 2,926,532); the Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably lighter (215g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO 15
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3740528 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Lighter: 215g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $599 vs $2899
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 17 points higher (86/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3740528 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 215 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $599 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO 15
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO 15
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO 15, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 15 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 21.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2300. Vivo iQOO 15 is cheaper by $2300.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (94/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.