Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X500 Pro Max
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X500 Pro Max (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 Pro Max leads — 92/100 vs 69/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (4,838,033 vs 2,926,532).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo X500 Pro Max
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
What makes Vivo X500 Pro Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4838033 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 4188 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 13145 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo X500 Pro Max, the Vivo X500 Pro Max scores 23 points higher (92/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max leads (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max leads (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X500 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9600 Pro | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 4838033 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 4188 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 13145 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | — | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X500 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X500 Pro Max
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X500 Pro Max
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo X500 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X500 Pro Max leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 39.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X500 Pro Max
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max is a bit better (100/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 Pro Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X500 Pro Max?
The Vivo X500 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 23 points (92/100 vs 69/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X500 Pro Max?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X500 Pro Max — 92/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X500 Pro Max?
The Vivo X500 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X500 Pro Max?
The Vivo X500 Pro Max leads on performance (100/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo X500 Pro Max?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X500 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.