Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo iQOO Neo 12
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 leads — 76/100 vs 69/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 has the bigger battery (9000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 is faster in AnTuTu (4,647,154 vs 2,926,532); the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 is noticeably lighter (225g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo iQOO Neo 12
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (52/100 vs 35/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 12 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4647154 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 9000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 225g vs 309g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 90/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (38/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 12, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 scores 7 points higher (76/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 leads (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 (52/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (38/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo iQOO Neo 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 4647154 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 11047 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 9000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 2200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 12
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 12
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Neo 12
- 9000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo iQOO Neo 12, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 12 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 37.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Neo 12
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (99/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 (52/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (38/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Neo 12?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 12 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo iQOO Neo 12?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 12 — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Neo 12?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo iQOO Neo 12?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 12 leads on performance (99/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo iQOO Neo 12?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Neo 12 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.