Poco C85 4G vs Vivo Y19s
The Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Vivo Y19s (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; estimated prices are $92 and $110. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco C85 4G leads — 32/100 vs 20/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Vivo Y19s is faster in AnTuTu (524,785 vs 358,383); the Poco C85 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y19s doesn't.
Poco C85 4G
Vivo Y19s
- Faster charging: 33W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Cheaper: $92 vs $110
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 524785 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 771 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1980 vs 1416
- Lighter: 199g vs 205g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Poco C85 4G vs the Vivo Y19s, the Poco C85 4G scores 12 points higher (32/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y19s (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G and the Vivo Y19s are nearly equal (48/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y19s is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Poco C85 4G | Vivo Y19s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 810 nits | 700 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm | 167.3×77.0×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 199 g | |
| Price | $92 | $110 |
Poco C85 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y19s
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Poco C85 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y19s
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C85 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y19s
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C85 4G and Vivo Y19s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y19s leads Poco C85 4G by 31.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $18. Poco C85 4G is cheaper by $18.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Poco C85 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Vivo Y19s (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G and the Vivo Y19s are nearly equal (48/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y19s is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Poco C85 4G or the Vivo Y19s?
The Poco C85 4G is noticeably better than the Vivo Y19s — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Poco C85 4G and the Vivo Y19s?
The Poco C85 4G has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Vivo Y19s — 20/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C85 4G or the Vivo Y19s?
The Poco C85 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C85 4G over the Vivo Y19s?
The Poco C85 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y19s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.