Samsung Galaxy M17 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Samsung Galaxy M17 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606; estimated prices are $130 and $114. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M17 leads — 26/100 vs 25/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17 is faster in AnTuTu (607,137 vs 330,006); the Samsung Galaxy M17 is thinner (7.5mm vs 8.6mm).
Samsung Galaxy M17
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 607137 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1963 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 25W vs 5W
- Better camera (28/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Lighter: 189g vs 192g
- Cheaper: $114 vs $130
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy M17 vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Samsung Galaxy M17 scores 1 points higher (26/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy M17 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 1330 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 607137 | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 952 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1963 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.7" Super AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1100 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 189 g | |
| Price | $130 | $114 |
Samsung Galaxy M17
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy M17 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy M17 leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $16. ZTE Blade A75 4G is cheaper by $16.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Samsung Galaxy M17 are nearly equal (63/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy M17 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 edges out the ZTE Blade A75 4G by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy M17 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 25/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy M17 over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy M17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.