Nokia G60 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Nokia G60 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G60 leads — 43/100 vs 34/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A75 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the Nokia G60 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 330,006).
Nokia G60
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 20W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 44/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 189g vs 190g
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 33/100)
Comparing the Nokia G60 vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Nokia G60 scores 9 points higher (43/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G60 leads (46/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (46/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (66/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (43/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 59/100.
| Specification | Nokia G60 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP52 | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.6 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $329 | — |
Nokia G60
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia G60
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia G60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G60 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G60 leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 79.4% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Blade A75 4G
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (46/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia G60 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (66/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia G60 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G are nearly equal (32/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (43/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 59/100.
Which is better: the Nokia G60 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia G60 edges out the ZTE Blade A75 4G by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G60 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia G60 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 34/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G60 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia G60 leads on performance (46/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G60 over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia G60 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for everyday use.