Nokia G310 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Nokia G310 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia G310 leads — 39/100 vs 34/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Nokia G310 is faster in AnTuTu (477,542 vs 333,647); the ZTE Blade A75 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia G310 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia G310
ZTE Blade A75 4G
What makes Nokia G310 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 477542 vs 333647
- Better Geekbench Single: 746 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1816 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 20W vs 5W
- Higher performance (41/100 vs 27/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A75 4G better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 195g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia G310 vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Nokia G310 scores 5 points higher (39/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100. In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Nokia G310 are nearly equal (59/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia G310 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ 5G | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 477542 | 333647 | |
| Geekbench Single | 746 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1816 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 165.1×75.7×8.6 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Nokia G310
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Nokia G310
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia G310
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Nokia G310 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia G310 leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 43.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia G310 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 44/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 43/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G and the Nokia G310 are nearly equal (59/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia G310 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia G310 edges out the ZTE Blade A75 4G by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia G310 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia G310 has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 34/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G310 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia G310 leads on performance (41/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G310 over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Nokia G310 (41/100 vs 27/100).