Nokia X30 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Nokia X30 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia X30 leads — 45/100 vs 34/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A75 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4200); the Nokia X30 is faster in AnTuTu (592,015 vs 330,006).
Nokia X30
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 592015 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 905 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2003 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 33W vs 5W
- Lighter: 185g vs 189g
- Higher performance (46/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (69/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 59/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4200 mAh
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 29/100)
Comparing the Nokia X30 vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Nokia X30 scores 11 points higher (45/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia X30 leads (46/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (43/100 vs 29/100). In the "performance" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (46/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (69/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (43/100 vs 29/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
| Specification | Nokia X30 | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.9×73.9×8.0 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nokia X30
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Nokia X30
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia X30
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia X30 and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Nokia X30 leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 79.4% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (46/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia X30 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (69/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a bit better (43/100 vs 29/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia X30 is a bit better (68/100 vs 59/100).
Which is better: the Nokia X30 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia X30 is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade A75 4G — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia X30 and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia X30 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia X30 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia X30 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia X30 or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia X30 leads on performance (46/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Nokia X30 over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Nokia X30 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for everyday use.