Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606; estimated prices are $1299 and $114. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 25/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 330,006); the ZTE Blade A75 4G is noticeably lighter (189g vs 214g).
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 330006
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 1335
- Faster charging: 60W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 189g vs 214g
- Cheaper: $114 vs $1299
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 32/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 20/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 50 points higher (75/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (100/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (84/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (86/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (63/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 3515964 | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3601 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10686 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 214 g | 189 g | |
| Price | $1299 | $114 |
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 965.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1185. ZTE Blade A75 4G is cheaper by $1185.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (84/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (86/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (63/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (100/100 vs 20/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G by 50 points (75/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.