Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 67/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 1,754,213); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is thinner (7.9mm vs 9.1mm).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 76
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Performance 75
Display 84
Camera 57
Battery 63
Portability 30
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 1754213
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 5311
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 75/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (51/100 vs 30/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 60 Ultra better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 60W

  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 17 points higher (84/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (51/100 vs 30/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3515964 1754213
Geekbench Single 3601 2004
Geekbench Multi 10686 5311
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 60W 80W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm
Weight 214 g
Price $1299
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
63
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3515964 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
67/100 -100.4%
1754213 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by 100.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (96/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (63/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (51/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 67/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.