Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $1299 and $700. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 73/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,780,751 vs 1,757,044).

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra edges out the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Performance 91
Display 88
Camera 81
Battery 56
Portability 46
Value for money 68

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

Performance 76
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 63
Portability 30
Value for money 60

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2780751 vs 1757044
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 5311
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (46/100 vs 30/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 60 Ultra better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
  • Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $1299

  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 56/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 6 points higher (79/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 76/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 68/100, ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (46/100 vs 30/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 2780751 1757044
Geekbench Single 3100 2004
Geekbench Multi 9760 5311
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 45W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 151 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm
Weight 218 g —
Launch price $1299 $700

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
81
camera

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
79/100
2780751 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
73/100 -58.3%
1757044 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by 58.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

$1299

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

$700

Launch price difference: $599. ZTE Axon 60 Ultra was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (46/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra edges out the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 73/100.

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.