Poco C85 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

The Poco C85 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $92 and $1531. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 69/100 vs 38/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C85 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 358,383); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.0mm).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Poco C85 4G by 31 points (69/100 vs 38/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C85 4G
Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 53
Portability 56
Value for money 60
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Performance 92
Display 78
Camera 52
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 42
What makes Poco C85 4G better?
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $92 vs $1531

  • Longer battery life (53/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better value for money (60/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1416
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better display (78/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C85 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 31 points higher (69/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (92/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (53/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G leads (60/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Poco C85 4G (92/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (78/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (60/100 vs 42/100).

Poco C85 4G: The Poco C85 4G is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco C85 4G Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 358383 3119308
Geekbench Single 432 3041
Geekbench Multi 1416 9494
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 720x1600 1968x2184
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 33W 25W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 8 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, HyperOS 2 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 810 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP48
Dimensions 171.6×79.5×8.0 mm 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm
Weight 205 g 215 g
Price $92 $1531
Camera comparison
Poco C85 4G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Poco C85 4G
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
Poco C85 4G
  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco C85 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C85 4G MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
38/100
358383 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +88.5%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Poco C85 4G by 88.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Poco C85 4G
$92
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
$1531

Price difference: $1439. Poco C85 4G is cheaper by $1439.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Poco C85 4G (92/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (78/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Poco C85 4G (52/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco C85 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco C85 4G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (60/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C85 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Poco C85 4G by 31 points (69/100 vs 38/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C85 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Poco C85 4G has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C85 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C85 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (92/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Poco C85 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?

The Poco C85 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.