Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1799 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 64/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 901,346); the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is noticeably lighter (222g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3060
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 73/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 222g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $1399 vs $1799
- Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 19 points higher (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 38/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (52/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 3060 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | — | |
| Weight | 285 g | 222 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $1399 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 239.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $400. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra was $400 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 73/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (52/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 73/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.