Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1799 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 64/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 901,346); the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is noticeably lighter (222g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Motorola Razr Fold

Performance 90
Display 81
Camera 91
Battery 68
Portability 52
Value for money 74

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

Performance 58
Display 88
Camera 73
Battery 56
Portability 37
Value for money 38

What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 901346
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1222
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3060
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 73/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 37/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 222g vs 285g
  • Cheaper at launch: $1399 vs $1799

  • Better display (88/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 19 points higher (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 38/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (52/100 vs 37/100).

Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Motorola Razr Fold Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 Samsung Exynos 990
AnTuTu 3057215 901346
Geekbench Single 2833 1222
Geekbench Multi 9119 3060
Display 8.1" LTPO AMOLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2480x2200 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 68W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 164 —
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 48 MP
Front camera 32 MP 40 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 10
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits —
NFC yes —
Protection IPX9 —
Dimensions 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm —
Weight 285 g 222 g
Launch price $1799 $1399

Camera comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 40MP
73
camera

Display comparison

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Battery and charging

Motorola Razr Fold

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 50W
68
battery

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
83/100
3057215 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra Samsung Exynos 990
64/100 -239.2%
901346 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 239.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Motorola Razr Fold

$1799

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra

$1399

Launch price difference: $400. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 73/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (52/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 64/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 73/100).

Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?

The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.