Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; estimated prices are $1799 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 39/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 901,346); the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is noticeably lighter (222g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3060
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 4/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 72/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 222g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $1399 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (22/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (13/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 38 points higher (77/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 72/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads (13/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 72/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (22/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (13/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3060 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | — | |
| Weight | 285 g | 222 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $1399 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 337.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $400. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is cheaper by $400.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 4/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 72/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (22/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (13/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 38 points (77/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 72/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 4/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.