Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1499 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 64/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 901,346); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 222g).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3060
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 222g
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (62/100 vs 34/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $1399 vs $1499
- Better camera (73/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 14 points higher (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads (73/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (62/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (93/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (62/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3060 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 222 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $1399 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 274.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra was $100 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (93/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (62/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads on camera score (73/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.