Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1499 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 64/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 901,346); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 222g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3060
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 222g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $1399 vs $1499
- Better camera (73/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 14 points higher (78/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads (73/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 38/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3060 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 222 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $1399 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 274.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (73/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads on camera score (73/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users.