Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; estimated prices are $1099 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 73/100 vs 39/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 901,346); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 222g).
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3060
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 222g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $1399
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 4/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 22/100)
- Better value for money (34/100 vs 13/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (72/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 34 points higher (73/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (34/100 vs 13/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (51/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (34/100 vs 13/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3060 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 222 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $1399 |
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 337.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $300. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is cheaper by $300.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 4/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a bit better (72/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (51/100 vs 22/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (34/100 vs 13/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 34 points (73/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads on camera score (72/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 4/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.