Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; launch prices were $1099 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 64/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 901,346); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 222g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3060
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 222g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1399
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 37/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 34/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (73/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 12 points higher (76/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads (73/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (73/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3060 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 222 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $1399 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 245.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $300. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra was $300 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (73/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 37/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 64/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra leads on camera score (73/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.