Motorola Signature vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
The Motorola Signature (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (2020) runs on the Samsung Exynos 990; estimated prices are $699 and $1399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Signature leads — 86/100 vs 39/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Signature has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Motorola Signature is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 901,346); the Motorola Signature is noticeably lighter (186g vs 222g).
Motorola Signature
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 901346
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1222
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3060
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 186g vs 222g
- Cheaper: $699 vs $1399
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 4/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 72/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 45/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (67/100 vs 22/100)
- Better value for money (62/100 vs 13/100)
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 39/100
Comparing the Motorola Signature vs the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, the Motorola Signature scores 47 points higher (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature leads (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature leads (91/100 vs 72/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature leads (68/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature leads (62/100 vs 13/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 4/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 72/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (67/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (62/100 vs 13/100).
| Specification | Motorola Signature | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 990 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 901346 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1222 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 3060 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 40 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 10 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×76.4×7.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 186 g | 222 g | |
| Price | $699 | $1399 |
Motorola Signature
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 48MP
- Front: 40MP
Motorola Signature
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1264x2780
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Signature
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Signature and Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Signature leads Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 337.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $700. Motorola Signature is cheaper by $700.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (92/100 vs 4/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (91/100 vs 72/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Signature notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (68/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (67/100 vs 22/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (62/100 vs 13/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra by 47 points (86/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Signature and the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra — 39/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature leads on camera score (91/100 vs 72/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Signature or the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature leads on performance (92/100 vs 4/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Signature over the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra?
The Motorola Signature is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.