Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $1799 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 24/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 153,667); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is noticeably lighter (196g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 846
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1799
- Overall rating 24/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 62 points higher (86/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100, Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 32/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (98/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (91/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (71/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy A03 Core | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 846 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $100 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 2465.9% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1699. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $1699 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (98/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (81/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (91/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (71/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 62 points (86/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.