Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $1099 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 24/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 153,667); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 846
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 196g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1099
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 52 points higher (76/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 36/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (91/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A03 Core | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 846 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $100 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 1827.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $999. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $999 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (91/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (94/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (57/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (66/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 52 points (76/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.