Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $1499 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 24/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 153,667); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.1mm).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 846
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1499
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 54 points higher (78/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 32/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (95/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy A03 Core | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 846 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $100 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 2099.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1399. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $1399 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (93/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (95/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (60/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 are nearly equal (66/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 54 points (78/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a better fit for everyday use.