Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (2022) runs on the Unisoc SC9863A; launch prices were $1099 and $100. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 24/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 153,667); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core doesn't; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 846
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A03 Core better?
- Lighter: 196g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $100 vs $1099
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 61/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 53 points higher (77/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 10/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 36/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (91/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (95/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (60/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (66/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A03 Core | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc SC9863A | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 153667 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 205 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 846 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $100 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy A03 Core
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A03 Core, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 1934.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $999. Samsung Galaxy A03 Core was $999 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (91/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (95/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (60/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core is a bit better (66/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core (68/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core by 53 points (77/100 vs 24/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core — 24/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A03 Core?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.