Motorola Razr 40 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 56/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 859,516); the Motorola Razr 40 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 40
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Razr 40 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 309g
- Better display (91/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (73/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 859516
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1044
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2785
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 5W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 13 points higher (69/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (90/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr 40 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (63/100 vs 34/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 859516 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1044 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2785 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Razr 40 by 70.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 40
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (90/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (91/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Razr 40 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (63/100 vs 34/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (73/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 40 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.