Motorola Razr 40 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
The Motorola Razr 40 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600; estimated prices are $586 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads — 57/100 vs 34/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 has the bigger battery (4300 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,830 vs 840,330).
Motorola Razr 40
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
- Faster charging: 30W vs 25W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper: $586 vs $1099
- Better camera (48/100 vs 30/100)
- Better value for money (69/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161830 vs 840330
- Better Geekbench Single: 3271 vs 1039
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11051 vs 2885
- Bigger battery: 4300 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 5W
- Lighter: 180g vs 188g
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 1/100)
- Longer battery life (23/100 vs 20/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 65/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 40 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 scores 23 points higher (57/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (77/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (48/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 leads (69/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (77/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (48/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Motorola Razr 40 are nearly equal (23/100 vs 20/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (75/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (69/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 40 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 | Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 840330 | 3161830 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1039 | 3271 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2885 | 11051 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1080x2520 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4300 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 170.8×74.0×7.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 180 g | |
| Price | $586 | $1099 |
Motorola Razr 40
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr 40
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
- 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1080x2520
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 40
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8
- 4300 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr 40 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads Motorola Razr 40 by 73.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $513. Motorola Razr 40 is cheaper by $513.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 (77/100 vs 1/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 40 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (48/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Motorola Razr 40 are nearly equal (23/100 vs 20/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a bit better (75/100 vs 65/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 40 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (69/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 40 by 23 points (57/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 40 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Motorola Razr 40 has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Motorola Razr 40 leads on camera score (48/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 40 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on performance (77/100 vs 1/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 40 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8?
The Motorola Razr 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for active users.